When A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms wrapped up its first season, it wasn’t the dragon-shredding spectacle we’d come to be accustomed to in their universe. Yes, the stakes were quite high, action-wise, but a handful of thought-provoking questions were thrown into the mix. Right after the gruesome Trial of Seven leaves Prince Baelor Targaryen (Bertie Carvel) dead, a wounded Ser Duncan the Tall is offered food, drink, and a ride to Storm’s End by Lyonel Baratheon (Daniel Ings), only for the conversation to take a hard left, twisting into accusations against the dead.
Lyonel Baratheon dismisses Baelor’s sacrifice, practically calling it a waste. His argument? The Prince “risked nothing” because he fought men whose oaths forbade them from harming him, and it was knights like Humfrey Beesbury and Ser Humfrey Hardyng who did the real risking. Dunk pushes back, hurt and furious that the nobleman who fought beside him against his own blood could be spoken of so distastefully. That exchange sets the stage for a serious Westerosi debate. What counts as real courage in Westeros, and who gets to judge it? With Baelor’s death shaping the emotional fallout and decisions that follow, Lyonel’s words leave a sour taste in the mouth, and it’s impossible not to wonder whether he was right or just cruel.
What Lyonel Baratheon Meant When He Questioned Baelor’s Heroism in The Trial of the Seven
When Lyonel Baratheon loses his cool with Dunk in the finale, the bone of contention isn’t random at all. In a nutshell, he completely reframes Baelor’s choice, giving both Dunk and the audience a fresh perspective. In this case, Lyonel insists that Baelor “risked nothing” in the Trial of Seven because he was basically fighting against men who had sworn to protect him. In other words, the Kingsguard would never strike their own prince.
In Lyonel’s opinion, the actual danger and heroism belonged to men like Beesbury, Hardyng, and himself, who volunteered for the battle, facing death as a real possibility. He feels so strongly about this that Baelor’s fatal injury, delivered in the melee, doesn’t change his point of view. He refers to Baelor’s involvement as tactical rather than brave. Say what you will, that unapologetic perspective is an attempt to ground Dunk’s guilt in grim reality.
How Dunk’s Choices Changed the Stakes on the Battlefield
So, here’s the thing: everything on that battlefield traces back to Dunk’s choices. The whole Trial of Seven situation only occurs because Dunk is the only guy within a mile honorable enough to defend Tanselle (Tanzyn Crawford), the puppeteer, from Prince Aerion Targaryen’s (Finn Bennett) violent and very public abuse. Unfortunately, the times don’t reward chivalry directed against the nobility, and the consequence is a royal confrontation that pulls in everyone from princes to lords, and sworn knights alike. It’s a smorgasbord of people who would otherwise never have crossed swords that day.
During the fight, Dunk focuses his efforts on Aerion, hoping to push the battle toward a decisive outcome. Unsurprisingly, Aerion eventually falls in defeat, clearing Dunk’s name. However, that victory comes at a steep cost. Ser Humfrey Beesbury (Danny Collins) and Ser Humfrey Hardyng (Ross Anderson) fall. Baelor later joins the mix, but much later, after realising he was probably leaking brain matter. Bottom line, none of them would have been there if not for Dunk’s plight. Whether Baelor fought for honor or spectacle or not, one thing is clear: Dunk’s guilt is not completely unfounded.
RELATED: ‘A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms’ Is What the World of Game of Thrones Actually Needs
Who Truly Went All In at the Trial of the Seven?
On paper, Baelor’s death is a complete sacrifice; after all, he chooses to enter the chaotic melee to back Dunk, fully knowing there’s a chance he could die. It certainly reads like bravery; that’s why viewers can empathize with it. But Lyonel does not approach this act with the same emotion; he’s weighing the risk here.
As mentioned earlier, Baelor is a prince who’s set to stand against men who swore fealty to him. So, while the chaos of the fight still gets him in the end, he entered it with protections others didn’t have. Then there’s Ser Humfrey Beesbury and Ser Humfrey Hardyng, men without the privilege of family names that can shield them. When they finally die, there’s no romantic framing around their deaths. Even Raymun Fossoway (Shaun Thomas), AKA the “Appleboy,” had more to lose than Baelor in Lyonel’s opinion.
Dunk himself is forced to make decisions that put him squarely in danger over and over again. With no titles to cushion his fall, all he has are his fighting skills to turn to when he faces choices that throw him into harm’s way. In a world where the idea that “the gods favor the brave” often lands as grim irony (as with the Red Wedding or Arya’s revenge on the Freys), true sacrifice is choosing to risk everything without any safety net at all. So, whether Baelor made a sacrifice is a matter of perspective.
Did Baelor die for honor or hubris? Stream A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms on HBO+ to dissect the situation yourself.
